|
|
Post by dagradiaboli on Apr 5, 2009 3:29:42 GMT -5
One technique i agree with is that, this movement should have no leader, and no face. It should be the ideas based on 4 Virtues (Freedom, Peace, Truth, and Knowledge) that should remain "Pure" so to speak.
We can wear armbands to identify ourselves, but if the governments have no head to cut off, the body can't' die, can it?
Feel free to expand on this idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by Operator on Apr 5, 2009 3:34:03 GMT -5
Sounds to me like some good founding ideals... I prefer the idea of having no leader, but a collective consciousness with similar goals; a hivemind, so to speak.
Once again, I think the white armbands are crucial. So would be posting slogans in public locations that can be a nod to one another- perhaps leaving behind slips of paper reading "06/01/09" or scrawling on bathroom walls, etc...
|
|
|
|
Post by spider on Apr 5, 2009 3:37:04 GMT -5
peace? most of us are willing to go all the way!
|
|
|
|
Post by jackfrost on Apr 5, 2009 4:59:46 GMT -5
Yes. A leaderless movement is most appealing.
If we could expand on those 4 virtues, that would be good.
And yes, the white armbands, or something similar, are crucial to the group. It unifies us.
|
|
|
|
Post by iamdisappoint on Apr 5, 2009 7:43:24 GMT -5
A leaderless movement is the only way. We decide what we want to do from this movement. Some things people won't agree with, like violence - when it comes to it. Having a leader forces people to follow blindly in submission = the problem right now, so it would be pretty 'durr hurr' to start a resistance following the same path to hell.
We are a collective group that knows we a screwed individually, but together will dismantle this beast with time.
Though if the time calls for it, I say we should jerk them around. Some of us have no problem taking the heat for a quick diversion, but you'd better be ready to back them up when signaled.
So should we start sending mixed signals for future options?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tacgnol on Apr 5, 2009 8:15:49 GMT -5
Reminds me of a few movies I have seen before.
One person takes the blame for something then another and another and so on.
You could royally mess with their heads if on the same day we have someone in every province/state all claim to be the "leader" to the news.
|
|
dodge
Rebel
Ne cede malis
Posts: 98
|
Post by dodge on Apr 5, 2009 20:30:19 GMT -5
You could royally mess with their heads if on the same day we have someone in every province/state all claim to be the "leader" to the news. We sooooooooooooooooooo need to do this  We should also have each of them name us something totally different, since our name is nonexistant. |
|
|
|
Post by notasheep on Apr 5, 2009 21:40:41 GMT -5
We're not out to mess with anyone's heads. If anyone asks who the leader is, just tell them that none of us follow, and we lead ourselves and each other equally.
|
|
|
|
Post by moomoomans on Apr 5, 2009 21:47:18 GMT -5
Sounds to me like some good founding ideals... I prefer the idea of having no leader, but a collective consciousness with similar goals; a hivemind, so to speak. Once again, I think the white armbands are crucial. So would be posting slogans in public locations that can be a nod to one another- perhaps leaving behind slips of paper reading "06/01/09" or scrawling on bathroom walls, etc... I paint graff[iti], wheatpaste, and sticker. If the money could be contributed, or if I could even just get blank stickers to draw on, I can have stickers with the board's url and/or some sort of symbol all over Las Vegas. I can print posters to wheatpaste too, so people will see them. |
|
