|
Post by atrasicarius on Apr 5, 2009 15:32:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by moomoomans on Apr 5, 2009 21:22:25 GMT -5
I'm watching it now. I will post my thoughts on it here when it's over
|
|
nolen87
Refugee
Oooo Snap he gon an don it again~
Posts: 45
|
Post by nolen87 on Apr 24, 2009 9:56:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by scartcticcg on Apr 24, 2009 11:35:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by atrasicarius on Apr 24, 2009 17:50:39 GMT -5
Yeah. Except, of course, for the fact that a rather large amount of the "facts" in that movie were pulled straight out of the directors' asses.
|
|
nolen87
Refugee
Oooo Snap he gon an don it again~
Posts: 45
|
Post by nolen87 on Apr 24, 2009 21:01:54 GMT -5
Wow that was a horrible article. It didn't debunk anything from the movie to the slightest bit. . . It just said "That's pretty much how Avery tells the story". So the fact that he demands questions to be answered makes him a nut with no facts? And yet you believe the "debunk" that brings no evidence other then the fact that is says just because? Right so you want me to blind believe what Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC, & CNN told me to the tea and not to question anything? Remember the video ask questions and does make alagations but only request the US Government to prove them wrong.
Also check out "pearl harbor conspiracy" and check out "Reichstag fire". *IF* 9/11 was in inside job it wouldn't be a first. Please if you want to argue a point bring more to the table then just because and blind faith.
|
|
nolen87
Refugee
Oooo Snap he gon an don it again~
Posts: 45
|
Post by nolen87 on Apr 24, 2009 21:08:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by atrasicarius on Apr 24, 2009 23:34:51 GMT -5
Wow that was a horrible article. It didn't debunk anything from the movie to the slightest bit. . . It just said "That's pretty much how Avery tells the story". So the fact that he demands questions to be answered makes him a nut with no facts? And yet you believe the "debunk" that brings no evidence other then the fact that is says just because? Right so you want me to blind believe what Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC, & CNN told me to the tea and not to question anything? Remember the video ask questions and does make alagations but only request the US Government to prove them wrong. Also check out "pearl harbor conspiracy" and check out "Reichstag fire". *IF* 9/11 was in inside job it wouldn't be a first. Please if you want to argue a point bring more to the table then just because and blind faith. I'm not saying 9/11 wasnt an inside job. I'm just saying Loose Change is a crappy movie that gets a lot of its facts wrong and makes a lot of baseless accusations.
|
|
|
Post by scartcticcg on Apr 25, 2009 5:22:39 GMT -5
And yet you believe the "debunk" that brings no evidence other then the fact that is says just because? Right so you want me to blind believe what Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC, & CNN told me to the tea and not to question anything? Not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that loose change is not reliable, that the director is an attention seeker and that the logic behind setting up such a massive operation is frankly ludicrous. Now I do think that the government knew that terrorists were going to attack the world trade centers months before it happend but didn't act upon it to give them the grounds to invade iraq. However I don't think that the government could pull it off without anybody noticing or speaking up. (If you didn't read the follow up article that the article links to then you should)
|
|